Real Climate Science

[image] Ice core data is smoothed. But when we look at other proxies we get the real picture. CO2 follows temperature, it's not the temperature knob. I believe this is what the mainstream UN science consortium has been trying to hide. CO2 is the product of warming, not the cause.

[image] Europe's high heat-related mortality during heat waves are heavily driven by low air conditioning (AC) adoption rates (~19-20% of households), rooted in policy, regulatory, and ideological priorities favoring energy reduction over widespread residential cooling.

[image] Modern warming is not unprecedented. Not even close.

[video] Coral reefs are thriving. Another failed doomsday prophecy from the climate activist cult and their media propagandists; built entirely on lies that never came true. #ClimateScam

[image] All the evidence suggests, CO2 rises with temperature, not the other way around.

[image] Anthropogenic CO2 is virtually zero % of the increase in CO2 over the last 100 years and virtually indistinguishable from the rest of the Common Era.

[image] What was Mann hiding? Notice the triangular convergence is closing from 1940s and 1970s. Could this be a sign of natural variability catching up after a large albedo change? Compare it to the "hockey stick" (image 2) and you'll see it.

[image] Natural emissions rate increases have been 3.5 to 4.5 times larger than from anthropogenic emissions due to many factors. Blaming humans for increases in CO2 is like focusing on the static noise and ignoring the signal. Nature drives the increase in CO2, not humans.

[image] Net Isotopic Signature Falsified This should be trending on social media everywhere as far as I am concerned. It's a major blow to the Climate Change narrative that all increases in CO2 are from man. The opposite is true. 13:38 Solving For Fossil Fraction

[text] With all due respect to the climate activists out there, just because you can warm up top roman noodles doesn't make you a chief. In the same way, providing a climate activist explanation doesn't make you a scientist.

[text] Yes, the basic physics of thermal flux and IR radiation have been understood for decades. What has not been understood, and remains poorly constrained, is how those mechanisms translate into precise, policy-grade predictions of future climate under rising CO2. Cloud feedbacks,

[image] Great post breaking down how green money is going to China.

[image] Decades of research caught lying about finding the isotopic signature. Certainly it's not me who is the apologist for the devil here. All data, sources and methods provided. Test it for yourself. I've done the actual scientific research. Francey et al. (1999) and the CSIRO

[video] Here's a demo on how to use the Summit Uncertainty Lab (link provided below). It's the most comprehensive simple explanation analysis of natural variability that nobody has ever told you before. (watch it until you understand it) Activists get it wrong.

[image] I laugh so hard when people try to intimidate me with supposed "hand waving". These people don't even understand the climate science the pretend to defend. 😂👇

[video] Climate activism is a form of terrorism. Why do you think they can't tolerate the opinions?

[text] A fraction of a fraction of CO2 causes oceans to warm with back radiation affecting the skin layer is 1 mm thick. CO2 affects 1% of it (0.01 mm). They imagine CO2, and not the Sun, heats this 0.01 mm "layer" and that THIS is what drives heat changes in the 4,000,000 mm ocean.

[image] He's, confused about who said what, scientists make that claim. This isn't settled science and Dieter ignores the uncertainties. The "skin layer" IS meaningless as Water vapor is the largest single contributor to the theory of the present-day greenhouse effect, not CO2. [In

[text] Reciting dictionary's is not a sign of intellect. M-AERI exists. Ship and satellite IR exist. The cool skin exists. None of that is the argument. It's is dress a scale leap and a category error as a lecture on “thermal boundary control,” then treat disagreement with the lecture

[image] Look how the last 26 years of proxy data has been omitted. What do you think about that? What do you think happened and why?

[image] Agreed. Geoengineering is a bad idea.

[video] Another example of the government manufacturing a consensus. This time about the origin of COVID. Conspiracies do happen on a massive scale and the idea that there is a scientific consensus on climate change is no different.

[text] Dear climate activists: A lifetime of applesauce doesn't make people who pick the actual apple into “applesauce deniers.” CAGW religion is modeled nonsense, not science. It's looking at the exhaust and trying to model the input rather that looking at the absorbed radiation.

[image] California is legislating away the right to own an older vehicle by making it more expensive to fuel, illegal to do your own cheap-repair work, and profitable to crush. If you live in California you are already less free and other states will follow.

[text] Swamps smell bad. Sick humans smell bad. Therefore humans cause swamps to smell bad! Anthropogenic global warming science is no different. Humans release CO2. CO2 is rising. Therefore. Humans must be causing CO2 to rise! Ridiculous 1800s logic!

[image] Reanalysis of the work of man reveals he was a fraud. All data, sources and methods, and models included.

[text] I just don't think this is true. Humans play such a small part in climate that destabilization is highly unlikely, especially considering that the climate has never been stable.

[image] Modern reconstructions are just proxies, not actual temperatures. These are estimates and I would say the warm periods were probably warmer than shown. The point is, warm periods are oscillations and we are simply in the modern warm period. It's not due to anthropogenic CO2.

[text] A very valid concern.

[text] The Cosmic-ray / cloud hypothesis: change in low level cloud albedo Higher solar activity (often correlated with TSI) strengthens the heliospheric magnetic field, which reduces galactic cosmic rays. Some authors argue that fewer cosmic rays mean fewer cloud condensation nuclei

[text] When teaching students, I begin each class by writing this on the board in chalk: “Just because I teach a theory doesn't mean it's right, and doesn't mean you should join the religion.” As Einstein urged, “Question everything.” I like to think he would approve.

[image] UN-driven net-zero madness plans to scrap coal, oil and gas for wind and solar in a civilization-scale gamble: fossils still deliver 86% of world energy while renewables supply just ~6% and cannot run industry, ships or planes. The price, per McKinsey, is $275 trillion by 2050;

[image] Who is misleading the public here? RCP8.5 is officially dead in its new modeling framework published in early 2026. 😳 Embarrassing.

[video] Watch the video and you'll see how some scientists have created their own 'myth-odologies'. The bedrock of so called "settled science" is a proxy-bias methodology that resembles circular logic and voodoo with a calculator more that it does real 'settled science'. #climatescam

[image] Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it. They'll keep repeating the same things with new deadlines until you start to realize it's all about generating generational fear.

[text] "bullshi1t"? All my work is perfectly sourced, I provide all sources and methods, data, and models as well as providing textbook answers and pertinent comments about the physics and links to all sources. So, if you have something useful to suggest, please do.

[image] 📣THERE IS NO CLIMATE CRISIS📣 Let's stop allowing the political theater to invade the real world of science. Activism and the biases that follow can't coexist with objective science. Fear-politics has no place in rational objective reasoning. Be an advocate not an activist.

[image] The latest article examines biases in climate-change science and how commonly used proxies and methods can protect established narratives rather than allowing the science to follow the evidence wherever it leads.

[image] New location for article on method biases in climate-change science and how commonly used proxies and methods can protect established narratives rather than allowing the science to follow the evidence wherever it leads.

[image] The Isotopic δ¹³C Lab has been approved.

[text] I've reproduced about ~50 studies now using their data, sources and methods and I am seeing a pattern of self deception.